Sunday, September 17, 2006

Bengals 34, Browns 17
I can assure there was no misprint. I took the Browns to win, because I just had a feeling. Erik apparently felt the same way.
But I forgot the biggest issue when predicting games: The best team usually wins.
The Browns are not as good as Cincinnati, and no offseason move could have changed that.
You will hear the phrase "work in progress" more than a few times. And, being that its Cleveland, it's easy to scoff.
But the Browns are getting better. Fans will just have to accept that the process will be slow.
Romeo Crennel will promise no quick fix, nor should he. The last quix fix came in 2002, and the team is still paying for it.
Here are my observations from Sunday's loss.
* Better pass rush this week, and Kamerion Wimbley looks like a superstar in the making.
* We need to see more of Kellen Winslow in the offense. Let's be honest -- we sometimes laugh at what he does or says, but he has been the team's most consistent receiver through two weeks. And I pity the tacklers. He needs to be the primary weapon on offense.
* Braylon Edwards dropped at least three key passes. He caught the long pass, but it's easy to forget that he is in many ways still a rookie. Despite his ability and attitude, he's still going to have lapses.
* The play-calling was again atrocious. But dropped passes and missed reads make offensive coordinators look like idiots.
* Someone complained when I ranked Carson Palmer in just the top five when ranking the league's quarterbacks. Sorry. He may be the second best quarterback, but is certainly no lower than third. Tom Brady may be better, but he won't be for long.
* The defense was not great, but it can't be against the Bengals, who have way too many weapons.
* CBS color man Solomon Wilcots said "pick your poison" about 12 times in the first half. Annoying.
* Charlie Frye will be fine.

3 Comments:

At 9:36 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is it with ex-Bengals behind the mic? How many times have we had to sit through Bob Trumpy and Cris Collinsworth call Browns games?

Then we have to deal with Boomer Esiason as a studio host? He predicted the Browns to "be in the Brady Quinn sweepstakes" this year, and he looks to be right.

Aren't the Browns had enough without having a bunch of ex-division rivals hating on them?

Maybe next year's studio panel will include Jack Lambert, Joe Greene and Ickey Woods. Maybe they can predict that the Browns will never win another game between now and the rapture.

 
At 2:19 PM , Blogger Joel said...

The above comment spoken exactly like a guy whose team could go 0-16.

(This coming from a fan of the Packers, who seem to be intent onracing Cleveland to the BRady Quinn sweepstakes.)

Who cares who the broadcasters are, if what they're saying is true?

 
At 7:23 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Brady Quinn is the prize for the NFL's worst team. Not exactly fighting for Mike Vick, are we?

To quote a David Spade line from PCU, "It doesn't matter who wins because they're all losers."

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home